When scoping a software development project, one of the first decisions you’ll face is how to structure the engagement: Time & Materials (T&M) or Fixed Bid. Both models have their place, but understanding the pros and cons of each can make or break your budget, timeline, and ultimate success.
At Xperts, we’ve helped thousands of clients navigate this decision, from startups building their first MVP to enterprises scaling complex platforms. Here’s what you need to know.
What Is a Time & Materials Contract?
Time & Materials contracts bill based on the actual hours worked and the resources used. You’re charged for the time developers, designers, project managers, and QA spend on the project - usually at a blended or role-specific hourly rate.
✅ Best for:
- Evolving requirements or shifting priorities
- Agile or iterative development processes
- Long-term or open-ended projects
- Clients who want flexibility and transparency
❌ Watch out for:
- Scope creep without clear guardrails
- Budget uncertainty if timelines aren’t well-managed
- Poor vendor communication (not a problem with Xperts 😎)
What Is a Fixed Bid Contract?
Fixed Bid contracts set a defined price for a clearly scoped deliverable. The vendor agrees to deliver a specific set of features or functionality within a set timeline and budget.
✅ Best for:
- Projects with clearly defined requirements
- Internal budgeting constraints or grant funding
- Simple MVPs or proof-of-concept builds
❌ Watch out for:
- Rigid scopes that may not adapt to evolving needs
- Over-specification leading to wasted effort
- Vendors padding bids to account for unknowns
Comparing the Two Approaches
Here’s how the two models stack up on key decision points:
- Flexibility
Time & Materials offers high flexibility, ideal for projects that evolve as you go. Fixed Bid is much more rigid - what’s scoped is what gets built. - Budget Predictability
Fixed Bid wins on upfront predictability since costs are locked in. T&M is more variable, but allows for tracking actual hours and adjusting scope as needed. - Timeline Control
T&M provides stronger real-time control, letting you speed up, slow down, or pivot priorities. Fixed Bid timelines are more rigid and often depend on change orders for mid-project adjustments. - Best Fit
Use T&M for agile development, scaling features over time, or fast-moving environments. Use Fixed Bid for well-defined MVPs or when internal stakeholders need a clear price tag. - Risk Profile
T&M shares the risk between client and vendor - you get flexibility, but need to manage scope. Fixed Bid shifts more risk to the vendor, which often leads to built-in buffers in both time and price.
What We Recommend at Xperts
Most of our successful long-term engagements use Time & Materials for a reason: software is rarely a straight line. Product-market fit, user feedback, or third-party dependencies often shift priorities — and T&M lets you adapt without the red tape of formal change requests.
That said, Fixed Bid can be perfect for:
- Pilot projects
- Non-technical stakeholders who want clear cost boundaries
- Fast MVPs where scope won’t change
We also frequently recommend hybrid models, where initial discovery or MVP phases are fixed bid, then shift into a T&M retainer once priorities become more dynamic.
So… Which One Is Right for You?
There’s no one-size-fits-all answer - but here’s a cheat sheet:
- Choose Time & Materials if:
You want flexibility, speed, and the ability to pivot quickly as you learn. - Choose Fixed Bid if:
You’ve nailed down your scope and want predictability above all else.
Still unsure? Let’s talk through it. We’ll recommend the right model based on your budget, goals, and timeline.
Ready to build smarter?
Book a free consult and we’ll help you scope your project the right way - from day one.
.png)
